To Chomskey the input is deficient or poor in two ways. The poverty of the stimulus implies that the sensory data available from input are insufficient to enable the child to discover certain rules in the language it is learning. The common arguments in support of the provery of the stimulus are discussed below. He mainly bases his theory on the ’poverty of the stimulus’ argument.Ĭhomskey and his followers interprete this poverty of the stimulus from various points of view. But Chomskey shows that this cannot be supported for a number of reasons. The argument that prevailed before Chomsky is that language is learnable from the input data only.That is to say the children learn their mother tongue by simple imitation, listening to and repeating what adults say. Learning a language is certainly different from learning other arts such as walking, playing, swimming etc.It is different in the sense that humans cannot learn their languages only on the basis of the sensory data or input as is possible in other cases.Then how do humans learn their language?Chomsky ,who represents an anthropological approach to linguistics, put forward an interesting theory called UG by which he shows that human brains are preprogrammed or pre-equipped with some tools called LAD to work collaborately with the input and in this way help produce languages.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |